People watch News much too so people can know who was better and who was bad. If someone gives money to the people working at the magazine ,then people working at the magazine will choose that someone wants. Its became unfair.
토론주제 : Should the readers of Time magazine choose its “Person of the Year”?
토론이용안내: 1.찬성,반대 중 선택>> 반론참여 버튼생성>>반론참여 클릭>>텍스트 입력, 음성녹음, 동영상등록 중 선택 의견을 남기세요.
2.반대 의견의 상대방 지목 은 최대 3명까지 가능하며, 반론에 대한 답글은 제한이 없습니다.
The magazine set out to the millions of people who anonymously contribute user-generated content to wikis and other websites such as Wikipedia, YouTube, MySpace, and Facebook,
Readers' opinions were canvassed online.
The power from the few and helping one another for nothing and how that will not only change the world.
Its critics underlined that Time ignores its digital democracy among its readers.
For me,the followers and readers isn’t just necessary;
it’s an integral part of the average author’s.The most important is a deserving person who has a heart of gold who helped many people around the world.
Yes, the readers of time magazine should choose its Person of the year.
People could have different opinions about its person of the year.
But, if we choose the person of the year, we can find out what makes people the best.
Many people would like to be 'its person of the year'.
Therefore, people will try to work better.
And it makes a nice society.
So, the readers should choose its person of the year.
The readers of time magazine should choose its 'person of the year'.
There is no reason that we could not choose one.
And many people will want to be a person of the year.
So they will try to work better.
It makes a better society.
So, the readers of time magazine should choose its person of the year.
I think the "Person of the year" is good to our, because people who are selected as the "person of the year" will feel good and those who are not will have a sense of inferiority. Good competition will make society better.